Criminal Law - Statement Inadmissable Against a Defendant in the Prosecution's Case in Chief Because of Lack of the Procedural Safeguards Required by Miranda v. Arizona, May, if Its Trustworthiness Satisfies Legal Standards, Be Used for Impeachment Purposes to Attack the Credibility of the Defendant's Trial Testimony

Authors

• Ronald V. Hirst

First Page

169

Recommended Citation

Ronald V. Hirst, Criminal Law - Statement Inadmissable Against a Defendant in the Prosecution's Case in Chief Because of Lack of the Procedural Safeguards Required by Miranda v. Arizona, May, if Its Trustworthiness Satisfies Legal Standards, Be Used for Impeachment Purposes to Attack the Credibility of the Defendant's Trial Testimony, 3 Loy. U. Chi. L. J. 169 (1972).
Available at: https://lawecommons.luc.edu/luclj/vol3/iss1/11